Thursday, March 21, 2019
Freakonomics A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything b
Freakonomics A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. DubnerFreakonomics brings unneurotic many combinations of thoughts that one wouldnt find relevant in companionship. The twain authors dispute comparisons that are so off the wall, that you almost question culture the book however, that is the reason many read the book in the first off place. The authors Levitt and Dubner compare in one chapter of Freakonomics the reason why drug dealers lie in with their moms. Throughout this chapter, the authors discuss questions well-nigh why intelligent people sometimes do not ask questions that people really care about, publicize and subject areas, and why, in general, do drug dealers still live with their moms. The use of good word deduction is prudent in the chapter because its proof builds the case for the qualitative point used during the drug dealings section of the chapter. I will discuss these three topics in detail and ana lyze the authors contributions to the arguments they present, by evaluating how the argument was portrayed based on the evidence given in the book. But if you can question something that people really care about and find an answer that may surprise themthat is, if you can overturn the schematic wisdomthen you may have some luck (Levitt and Dubner 87). What Levitt and Dubner meant by this passage, is that if you divulge yourself into questions, ridiculous or not, you might find something you are feeling for. If there are unanswered questions, and no one is asking them, they are bound to yield uninte confronting answers (Levitt and Dubner 87). Meaning, people are not ordinarily asking questions in which they are not interested in the answers. From a personal no... ...ves otherwise. A foot soldier makes, according to the financial evidence given, $3.30 an hour. Actually, many foot soldiers held other jobs to supplement the low wages they were issued dealing drugs. The eviden ce given in this section of the chapter was useful to the reader to show and visually absorb the material. As a whole, the evidence given in this chapter was sufficient in building a cohesive thought. However, the advertising and survey section of the chapter through me for a loop and almost made me carry reading the chapter all together. The use of testimonial, measurement, and analytical data discussed in the chapter allowed me to real understand the point that the authors were trying to get across to the reader. The chapter, like the rest of the book, contains thoughts that are not conventional in nature and are provoke to think about.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.